Liberty Videos
Monday, February 11, 2008

End Game – Alex Jones’ newest documentary video EndGame. For the New World Order, a world government is just the beginning. Once in place they can engage their plan to exterminate 80% of the world’s population, while enabling the “elites” to live forever with the aid of advanced technology. For the first time, crusading filmmaker ALEX JONES reveals their secret plan for humanity’s extermination: Operation ENDGAME.

This is a MUST SEE film!

Click on the DVD cover to buy ENDGAME.

You can find More Alex Jones Documentary Videos and other Liberty Videos at: www.LibertyVideos.org and www.WatchTerrorStorm.com

Despite official maps, documents, plans and bills in Congress the reality of the NAU and trans border superhighway is still denied as Ron Paul is attacked for speaking out about it.

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Monday, Dec 3, 2007

The media campaign to deny the reality of the move towards a North American Union in the mold of the European Union, which would encompass a merging of the economies of The US, Canada and Mexico, continues with a sharp focus on attacking presidential candidate Ron Paul who has spoken about the move on numerous occasions.

The North American Union issue came to the fore last week when Congressman Ron Paul was sardonically asked during the CNN GOP debate if he believed in it as his many supporters have suggested.

Dr Paul put the record straight by explaining that it is ludicrous to call the very real NAU movement a conspiracy theory.

“The CFR exists, the Trilateral Commission exists,” Paul explained. “And it is a ‘conspiracy of ideas,’ this is an ideological battle. Some people believe in globalism, others believe in national sovereignty. And there is a move on toward a North American Union, just like early on there was a move for a European Union that eventually ended up. So we have NAFTA and a move toward a NAFTA highway, these are real things.”

Despite Ron Paul’s explanation that these things are real, and despite overwhelming and manifestly provable evidence that they are real, the hacks at CNN spent much of their post debate coverage attacking the Congressman on the issue as if he were insane.

The post debate coverage in the video below features these attacks followed by a look at the various legislation, maps and websites that document the reality of a move toward a North American Union and a trans national corridor:

Ron Paul again had to explain on CNN yesterday that plans for the NAU and an accompanying highway exist in reality despite continued mind numbing denial:

The framework on which the American Union is being pegged is a cross border North American Free Trade Agreement super highway that stretches from southern Mexico through the US up to Montreal Canada.

The organisation overseeing the implementation of the highway is NASCO, the North America SuperCorridor Coalition Inc., which describes itself as a “non-profit organization dedicated to developing the world’s first international, integrated and secure, multi-modal transportation system along the International Mid-Continent Trade and Transportation Corridor to improve both the trade competitiveness and quality of life in North America.”

NASCO has received $250 million in earmarks from the U.S. Department of Transportation to plan the NAFTA Super Highway as a 10-lane limited-access road (five lanes in each direction) plus passenger and freight rail lines running alongside pipelines laid for oil and natural gas. One glance at the map of the NAFTA Super Highway as produced by NASCO makes clear that the design is to connect Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. into one transportation system.

Toll roads are to be placed upon existing roads in Security Prosperity Partnership agreements that bypasses Congress, agreements between the bureaucracies of the US and Mexican governments, to raise capital to build the Super highway that will go South of Texas and into Mexico.

Security Prosperity Partnership documents reveal that out of 85 interstate highways, 83 of them are slated to go under this agreement and toll roads are going down on them already. The money from this operation with further fund the dismantling of US sovereignty by seizing the infrastructure at it’s very heart in a bloodless coup.

The highway is to be linked to the Trans-Texas Corridor the first leg of the highway which will connect Mexico with the US. This is being overseen by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) which is a member of NASCO.

The NAFTA corridor movement also involves CANAMEX, another trade organization that promotes a Western tri-lateral route utilizing I-19, I-10, I-93 and I-15 in the states of Arizona, Nevada, Utah, Idaho and Montana to link the three countries in trade. See below (click to enlarge).

Another non-profit group, the North American Forum on Integration (NAFI), identifies four bands of NAFTA corridors (Pacific, West, East and Atlantic), all relying primarily upon internationalizing north-south existing interstate highways into NAFTA trade corridors. See below.

The NAFI website states the following:

“Following the implementation of NAFTA, coalitions of interest have been formed in order to promote specific transport channels, to develop the infrastructures of these channels and to propose jurisdictional amendments to facilitate the crossing of borders. These coalitions include businesses, government agencies, civil organizations, metropolitan areas, rural communities and also individuals, wishing to strengthen the commercial hubs of their regions.”

“The North American trade corridors are bi- or tri-national channels for which various cross-border interests have grouped together in order to develop or consolidate the infrastructures. The North American corridors are considered multimodal in the sense that they bring into play different modes of transport in succession.”

“The infrastructures may include roads, highways, transit routes, airports, pipelines, railways and train stations, river canal systems and port facilities, telecommunications networks and teleports.”

The architects of this unification are not just in name merging the agencies and the laws and the regulations, they are physically getting rid of the borders by buying off and lobbying the politicians at the state level, who then hand the roads over to international bodies and their subsidiary companies.

At the end of January we reported on the revelation that one of the foreign toll road conglomerates, Macquarie, has agreed to buy dozens of newspapers in Texas and Oklahoma that have up until now been harsh critics of the Trans Texas Corridor superhighway. This indicates a clear example of influence peddling pointing to racketeering, and a desperate lunge to silence dissent against the sellout of American infrastructure and the North American Union.

The mainstream media will keep telling you none of this is real, that its on a par with invading space aliens and that if you believe in any of it you are totally crazy.

The further incontrovertible evidence for a NAU agenda is overflowing, you could write entire books on the issue.

The initial Security and Prosperity Partnership agreement was signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005. It established working groups, under the North American Free Trade Agreement office.

Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) documents released under the FOIA show that a wide range of US administrative law is being re-written in stealth under this program to “integrate” and “harmonize” with administrative law in Mexico and Canada, just as has become commonplace within the EU.

The documents contain references to upwards of 13 working groups within an entire organized infrastructure that has drawn from officials within most areas of administrative government including U.S. departments of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Health and Human Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

Further documents (PDF link) from last year’s SPP meeting in Banff which were obtained by Judicial Watch under the FOIA, refer to an “evolution by stealth” agenda for the SPP, explaining that the Congress and the American people would not willingly go along with such a move.

This stealth agenda has also been carefully pointed out in a Hudson Institute White Paper entitled Negotiating North America: The Security and Prosperity Partnership (PDF)

“The most important feature of the SPP design is that it is neither intended to produce a treaty nor an executive agreement like the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) that would require congressional ratification or the passage of implementing legislation in the United States. The SPP was designed to function within existing administrative authority of the executive branch.”

The paper also states “mobility across the border is central to the idea of an integrated North American economic space.”

The Hudson White Paper also reminds us that the 2005 Council on Foreign Relations document called “Building a North American Community” bragged that its recommendations are “explicitly linked” to SPP. The Council on Foreign Relations document called for establishing a “common perimeter” around North America by 2010, the development of a biometric North American border pass, and the adoption of a North American tariff.”

Further CFR documents have revealed that the group wants to “establish private bodies that would meet regularly or annually to buttress North American relationships, along the lines of the Bilderberg conferences.” (Bilderberg are the power brokers behind the formation of the EU and the single European currency)

During the recent secretive SPP meeting an advisory Council created last year known as the North American Competitiveness Council met on issues including border regulation and competitiveness in the automotive, transportation, manufacturing and services sectors. The council is expected to meet annually with security and prosperity ministers and will engage with senior government officials on an ongoing basis.

The most recent SPP meeting in Canada also saw the US army enforce a huge 25km security perimeter as well as cracking down on protests, barring media and shutting down public forums in the vicinity of the event.

Eighteen states have introduced resolutions calling on their federal representatives to halt work on the North American Union (they include Virginia and South Carolina). Three of these states (Idaho, Montana and Oklahoma) have passed their resolutions.

Oklahoma, which is in the path of the superhighway component of the North American Union passed their resolution in the Senate 97-0. (see Basic Search Form link – top left – type in SCR10)

This came after it was revealed that the Mayor of Oklahoma City, with the approval of 90 other officials, signed a document endorsing an economic and political integration of the U.S. with Canada and Mexico.

22 U.S. Congressmen, including NC’s Virginia Foxx and Walter Jones, along with all three Republican Congressmen running for President, have signed on as co-sponsors of HCR40, which calls on the executive branch to end all work on the North American Union and the proposed superhighway.

Even the Sierra Club of Canada is sounding the alarm against the North American Union.

The standardization and centralization of policy into a North American Union framework is very real, a fact we personally came face to face with this week after our office received a letter from the Texas Workforce Commission demanding that we provide business information for the purposes of assigning a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code to our location.

Click for enlargements.

The NAICS website reveals that “The North American Industry Classification System has replaced the U.S. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system. NAICS will reshape the way we view our changing economy.”

“NAICS was developed jointly by the U.S., Canada, and Mexico to provide new comparability in statistics about business activity across North America.”

The fact that we received this letter and that businesses across America are being forced to submit census information for the purposes of registration in a North American database that includes Mexico and Canada is no “conspiracy theory,” its another documented step on the road to full harmonization and integration.

The planned introduction of the Amero, a pan-American currency lambasted in the Globe piece as another conspiracy theory, is common knowledge amongst all financial analysts worth their salt. Steve Previs of Jefferies International talked about it on a CNBC segment in November last year.

Just last week, renowned money manager Stephen Jarislowsky told a parliamentary committee in Canada that “we have to really seriously start thinking of the model of a continental currency just like Europe,” as he advocated the creation of a North American currency to replace the Canadian dollar, the U.S. dollar and the peso.

Robert Pastor, one of the architects of the plan for a regional government, has authored a book and speaks at confabs in front of governmental officials, promoting the adoption of the amero as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar and the peso.

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox himself admitted the plan for a North American “euro-dollar” currency during an appearance on Larry King Live recently.

The latest media attacks come on the back of a recent Boston Globe piece entitled The amero conspiracy, the latest in a long line of public relations stunts on behalf of the establishment to attempt to hoodwink Americans into thinking that the NAU is crackpot conspiracy fodder on a par with bigfoot, when in reality a plan for merging the Americas is on the record and its protagonists have long bragged about their goal to destroy U.S. sovereignty in pursuit of world government.

The ultimate goal, to bring together the Pan American Union, the Asian Union and the European Union into a structure of world government, is also often scoffed at by the media as another conspiracy theory, but the agenda to end U.S. sovereignty in the interests of centralizing global power is a concept that has been pushed by elitists for decades and their intentions to do so are on the record.

Here are just a handful of quotes from top power brokers attesting to that fact, as well as warnings from those who oppose it.

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”
Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, 1992.

“If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis … In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than f rom the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)

“Ultimately, our objective is to welcome the Soviet Union back into the world order. Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations.”
President George Bush Texas A&M University 1989

“There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international . . . network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies . . . but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”
Professor Carroll Quigley, in his book Tragedy and Hope, 1966.

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”
- David Rockefeller

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

“The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.”
U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater in his 1979 book: With No Apologies.

Every time the agenda for full political and economic integration is advanced one step further, whether by treaties, lawfully binding agreements or rhetoric about what the next step will be, the establishment media steps in to scoff at such patently observable developments and label them “conspiracy theories”.

We have previously seen articles in other major publications that exactly mirror each other in denying the existence of the NAU. The establishment media has promoted this consistent hoax and repeatedly engaged in mass public deception.

This tactic of smearing anyone who attempts to raise the issue and to categorically deny reality comes directly from those who are pushing the NAU

The following is another presentation that pits the reality of the NAU agenda against the continued denial of its existence:

Many of the afore mentioned media hit pieces surmise that the entire subject of the North American Union is an urban myth that “feeds on American fear of immigration and globalization”, just as Bush outlines above.

Other media hit pieces against the North American Union “conspiracy” seem to hinge on the notion that the globalists pushing for it don’t call it a “union” but a “community”. This is akin to when David Rockefeller dismissed the notion that he was aiding the creation of a global government, instead asserting only that he believed in “global governance”. The media are basically ninnying about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

Whatever you want to call it – a plan for political, economic and social integration of the Americas is afoot and it is being rammed through with little or no say from Congress or the American people.

However, as the old saying goes, any kind of PR is good PR. The rapid move toward a North American Union is finally getting mainstream attention, as witnessed by the increased effort on behalf of the corporate media to deny its reality and implement the usual technique of branding it a myth or baseless conspiracy theory. As the attacks become more pronounced, the clearer it will become that the move toward a NAU is a very real prospect.

Sui Juris News
opEd News
Monday November 19, 2007

On November 5 I attended a lecture by former Mexican President Vicente Fox at the FM Kirby Center in Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania. The President was hosted by Wilkes University as part of that school’s “Outstanding Leader’s Forum;” the selection of President Fox however did not quite complement the prodigious title of the lecture series.

The President’s speech was much more a piece of vague rhetoric than a well prepared lecture. A general lack of detail plus a certain absence of reason describe the mood of the remarks. Regardless of his conspicuous shortcomings, Fox was met with much applause from a crowd of upper middle class fawners who couldn’t resist the chance to rub shoulders with local establishment personalities in the presence of a foreign former head of state. I even saw one man who capitalized on the evening as an opportunity to wear a Mexican flag lapel pin. To be sincere, the entire scene made an aspect of my dignity cringe.

The audience’s attitude of affected attention and interest at least served as an effective setting for President Fox’s speech, in which Fox detailed his vision of North America’s future.

Without naming any benefits for the United States, Fox stated that NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement) has worked well for America, although, according to the Economic Policy Institute, NAFTA has cost America over a million jobs – a statistic Fox failed to mention.

Moreover Fox stated that NAFTA must be “expanded” along the model of the European Union. This statement did receive ignorant approval from the audience at the point when Fox’s diction and tone demanded; however, it was soon forgotten though it admits a serious threat to American sovereignty: the fact that a North American Union is a prospect so realistic that it is admitted and proposed by a former head of state.

Fox addressed any concerns that an EU like North American Union would threaten American sovereignty by stating that, for example, French culture still exists under the European Union. Sadly though Fox and his audience missed the point that America is not like France, its identity is inherent to its middle class culture and individualism. Americana was the product of national identity, a strong middle class, and good employment, not the international bureaucracy, tri-national integration, and post industrialism that Fox lauds.

After Fox fielded some prearranged soft ball questions that had been filtered through Wilkes University staff I confronted him at the stage where some “fans” were getting pictures taken. “President,” I said with feigned enthusiasm “when ideally will we have a North American Union Parliament?” Fox seemed to be pleased by the question and said that a North American Union Parliament realistically could be achieved within fifty years, as fifty years is how long the development of a European Union parliament took.

To me the president’s response is a bit of a shibboleth as it does confirm that a North American Union parliament is indeed a long term goal of the internationalist movement.

Then I asked Fox what his opinion is of the Bilderberg Group. Fox’s smile soon left his face and he asked “the what?” “The Bilderberg Group,” I said. My clarification had no impact. In fact Fox said that he had never heard of the Bilderberg Group, which might be true as, I believe, a Mexican official has never attended one of the group’s secret conferences.

I then commented that in the Council on Foreign Relation’s Plan “Building a North American Community” the Bilderberg Group is cited as a role model for round table groups dedicated to creating a North American Community.

Fox appeared agitated and nervous, perhaps because he actually never did hear of the Bidlerberg Group, and stated in a determined and prompt voice that “Questions are over.” The situation didn’t seem like one that called for agitation and so I left the building leaving Fox still surrounded by autograph seekers and men in Mexican flag lapel pins, with whom I hope he at least found some comfort.

Former Mexican president wants North American Union based on EU

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, October 9, 2007

RELATED: Ex-Mexican prez: Yes, there will be an amero

Mexico’s former president, Vicente Fox, made an astounding admission last night on CNN’s Larry King Live when he acknowledged the plan for a NAFTA single currency, a “euro-dollar” as King labeled it.

Fox also vowed to help unite the Americas beyond a trade agreement, following what he described as “a new vision, like we are trying to do with NAFTA”.

The comments follow Fox’s appearance on The Daily Show in which he advocated the creation of a North American Union based on the model of the European Union.

Watch the video:

TRANSCRIPT FROM CNN.com.

KING: E-mail from Mrs. Gonzalez in Elizabeth, New Jersey. “Mr. Fox, I would like to know how you feel about the possibility of having a Latin America united with one currency?”

FOX: Long term, very long term. What we propose together, President Bush and myself, it’s ALCA, which is a trade union for all of the Americas. And everything was running fluently until Hugo Chavez came. He decided to isolate himself. He decided to combat the idea and destroy the idea…

KING: It’s going to be like the euro dollar, you mean?

FOX: Well, that would be long, long term. I think the processes to go, first step into is trading agreement. And then further on, a new vision, like we are trying to do with NAFTA.

In a recent appearance on The Daily Show With John Stewart, Fox also expressed his desire for a North American Union based on the model of the European Union.

Canadian Police Caught Attempting To Stage Riots
Authorities admit rock-wielding “black bloc anarchists” were really police infiltrators

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, August 24, 2007

Quebec provincial authorities have admitted that three rock-wielding mask-wearing “anarchists” were in fact police infiltrators used to gather information on protesters at this week’s SPP summit, but authorities are still ludicrously denying the fact that the provocateurs were intent on causing a riot in order to justify a heavy-handed response.

Yesterday, debunkers attempted to claim that identical yellow marks on the boots of the “anarchists” and the police were simply Canadian Safety Industry seals and dismissed allegations that the three “anarchists” were undercover cops. Those same trolls and apologists for the authorities have egg on their face today after the police were forced to admit their role in using disguised cops to infiltrate the protesters before staging their arrests when they were exposed as agent provocateurs.

“Police came under fire Tuesday, when a video surfaced on YouTube that appeared to show three plainclothes police officers at the protest with bandanas across their faces. One of the men was carrying a rock,” reports CBC.

“In the video, protest organizers in suits order the men to put the rock down, call them police instigators and try unsuccessfully to unmask them.”

“Quebec provincial police admitted Thursday that three of their officers disguised themselves as demonstrators during the protest at the North American leaders summit in Montebello, Que. However, the police force denied allegations its undercover officers were there on Monday to provoke the crowd and instigate violence.”

Protest organizers confirmed that four arrests had been made in total during the summit, all of legitimate demonstrators, meaning that the arrests of the “anarchists” was a staged event purely for public and media consumption to create the myth that the police were responding to the fact that one of the anarchists was wielding a rock and attempting to break through a police line.

Watching the video, it is clearly evident that as soon as the trio are exposed as police, they try to casually drift back into police ranks before cops are forced to stage their arrests.

Firstly, why should we accept the notion that it’s legitimate for police officers to engage in tactics more familiar to rogue intelligence agencies by disguising themselves as anarchists in order to spy on completely non-violent protesters who are merely exercising their right to peaceably assemble?

Secondly, if the police had to go to the lengths of staging arrests to perpetuate the myth that the “anarchists” were real protesters then why should we believe for a second that they weren’t intent on causing violence, since they had armed themselves with projectiles?

The so-called “black bloc” anarchists are completely infiltrated and controlled by the security services and are routinely employed at major protest events to cause riots and demonize legitimate peaceful protesters.

Dave Coles, president of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, confronts the undercover cops and attempts to remove their face masks before the cops try to skulk back behind the police line.

In Seattle in 1999 at the World Trade Organization meeting, the authorities declared a state of emergency, imposed curfews and resorted to nothing short of police state tactics in response to a small minority of hostile black bloc hooligans. In his film Police State 2, Alex Jones covered the fact that the police allowed the black bloc to run riot in downtown Seattle while they concentrated on preventing the movement of peaceful protestors. The film presents clear evidence that the left-wing anarchist groups are actually controlled by the state and used to demonize peaceful protesters.

At the WTO protests in Genoa 2001 a protestor was killed after being shot in the head and run over twice by a police vehicle. The Italian Carabinere also later beat on peaceful protestors as they slept, and even tortured some, at the Diaz School. It later emerged that the police fabricated evidence against the protesters, claiming they were anarchist rioters, to justify their actions. Some Carabiniere officials have since come forward to say they knew of infiltration of the so called black bloc anarchists, and that fellow officers acted as agent provocateurs.

At the Free Trade Area of Americas protests in Miami in late November 2003, more provocateuring was evident. The United Steelworkers of America calling for a congressional investigation, stated that the police intentionally caused violence and arrested and charged hundreds of peaceful protestors. The USWA suggested that billions of dollars supposedly slated for Iraq reconstruction funds are actually being used to subsidize “homeland repression” in America.

The leadership of the black bloc has been completely usurped by the authorities and anyone who still professes to be a member of the group is either supremely naive or completely stupid. To dress up like terrorists, all in black with ski masks and bandanas (like the police) immediately sends out a negative message to the watching public and demonizes legitimate protesters.

The black bloc should be immediately disbanded and anyone that dresses in their garb and threatens to engage in violence at a protest should be exposed to the media for what they are – dirty cowboy cops who think their job is to spy on and abuse peaceful protesters, scum who prey on the weak and give good police a bad name while ensuring the right to protest is chilled.