Time is going by so quick as the Iowa caucuses are just a month away. The www.TeaParty07.com mass donation day is less than two weeks away. Ron Paul supporters are working hard to get Ron Paul’s name and message out since the media continues to ignore Ron Paul. They swoon all over their so-called “top tier” candidates on a daily basis. It doesn’t matter what the content of the story is, it never fails that you’ll hear Hillary, Obama, Rudy and Mitt mentioned every day.
Republicans are an interesting group though, because we all know that about 70% or so of the American people aren’t happy with the war. Now, if the Republicans don’t want to lose next November, wouldn’t it be smart to nominate an anti-war Republican? If they don’t want to be taxed into oblivion to pay for a never ending war, wouldn’t it be smart to nominate Ron Paul?
Republicans Face Certain Defeat With Pro-War Candidate says Ron Paul.
“Since 70 per cent of the American people want out of the war and they’re tired of it – the Republicans better pick somebody who is opposed to the war or have a new foreign policy or they can’t win,” the Congressman told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer yesterday.
“The sentiment is shifting, the people are sick and tired of the war, we can’t even afford it, we can’t even fight the war without borrowing the money from the Chinese – so it doesn’t add up – it really doesn’t matter whether I’m right or wrong, the war is going to end because we’re going to have such a political and financial havoc here….this is usually how empires end – by spending too much money maintaining their empires,” he added.
The Congressman’s warning is backed up by the polls. A recent Zogby survey found that a sizeable majority of Americans will not vote for a pro-war candidate. Zogby polling analyst Fritz Wenzel agrees that Ron Paul is the strongest contender out of the entire Republican field to go up against Hillary Clinton because of his lone anti-war stance.
In an earlier part of the interview, the Congressman elaborated on his response to Senator John McCain’s feeble attempt to smear Paul as a Nazi appeaser during Wednesday night’s debate.
“First off, Iraq is not Nazi Germany,” a humored Paul commented.
“I thought it was Hitler that caused world war two, not the American people….it didn’t make any sense – then he was awfully confused about isolationism versus non-intervention – there’s a big difference,” said the Congressman.
Paul said that non-interventionism meant not getting involved in other country’s affairs and “not pretending that Iraq is Nazi Germany.”
“Iraq had no army, no navy, and no weapons of mass destruction – it had nothing to do with 9/11 – so the comparison makes no sense,” he concluded.
McCain’s claim that U.S. troops want to stay in Iraq has no basis in reality.
Out of all the Republican candidates, Ron Paul has received by far the highest military donations, that is donations from members of the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force and Coast Guard. The Congressman has received double McCain’s total and over eight times the amount garnered by Romney or Giuliani.
The troops support Ron Paul because Ron Paul advocates bringing the troops home.
Moreover, a recent Zogby poll found that the Congressman also has the highest support amongst military families, far ahead of Giuliani, McCain or any of the other Republican stooges who want to keep the troops in the meat grinder.
…So my friends Ron Paul has support from all circles. He has supporters showing up everywhere. Ron even mentioned today on his website that Rudy came to him after the debate and said… “Oooh, you sure have a LOT of supporters.”
The rEVOLution can not be stopped…
Possibly Related Articles (list auto-generated)
1 user responded in this post
It’s TRUE!
Republicans won’t win if they don’t nominate Ron Paul.
It would be the dumbest thing, next to voting for Bush, in the history of the Republican party.
Leave A Reply
Please Note: Comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comments